Legal Opinion

Golding v. Modern Woodmen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTeimble, P. J.

This action is on a benefit cer tificate for $1000 issued by the defendant, a fraternal beneficiary society, on the life of plaintiff’s son, Charles Solomon Golding, • Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff for the amount of the policy with interest, and defendant appealed.

The answer, after admitting the issuance of the policy, and the death of young Golding, set up, as a defense thereto,' breach of warranty based on the fact that, in his application he stated: “I am now of sound body, mind and health, and free from diseases or injury,” and on the further fact, that, in said application,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. AngleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. McDermott v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Griffith v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zeilman v. Cent. Mut. Ins. Assn.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Park v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Nitsche v. Security Benefit Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API