Legal Opinion
Zieba v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 2, 1982No. Civ. A. B-81-286PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
In this diversity action the plaintiffs, who were insured under a policy issued by defendant, seek to recover damages for destruction of their property by fire in their Florida condominium. Defendant, Middle-sex Mutual Assurance Company (“Middle-sex”), moves for summary judgment. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56.
I. FACTS
The basic facts are not in dispute. In Connecticut on December 28, 1978, plaintiffs, Zygmunt and Lucy Zieba, purchased a homeowner’s insurance policy from Middle-sex, effective for one year, insuring property in their…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Cooper v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Schoonover v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Magnolia Square Homeowners Ass'n v. Safeco InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.