Legal Opinion

Arterburn v. Home Depot USA Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 25, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00408Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 8 CLYDE A. ARTERBURN, an individual, Case No. C22‐408‐RSM 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 10 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 11 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. dba/aka Home 12 Depot, a Foreign Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home 17 Depot”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. #29. Plaintiff Clyde Arterburn opposes. Dkt. 18 #43. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that Plaintiff has established a genuine 19 20…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Daryl Crane Pamela Crane v. Conoco, Inc., a Corporation, and Nunnallee-Cantwell, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Sullivan v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API