Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Bavusa

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2003No. 48 EAP 2000Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Saylor

Although I concur in the result, I would hold that the statutory criteria by which a perpetrator of the offense of carrying a firearm without a license is adjudged to have committed a felony or misdemeanor, see 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106, are substantive elements of the crimes, as opposed to sentencing factors (as the majority holds) or affirmative defenses (as the Superior Court determined). My reasoning follows.

First, it is significant, at least to me, that the relevant provision appears in the Crimes Code, as opposed to the Sentencing Code. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 528 U.S. 224, 234,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API