Legal Opinion
Spotless Enterprises, Inc. v. a & E Products Group L.P.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 1, 2003No. 1:97-mj-00427PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
Spotless Plastics Pty. Ltd., an Australian entity (“Spotless AU”), and Spotless Enterprises, Inc. 1 (“Spotless USA”) (collectively, “Spotless”), are manufacturers of clothing hangers. Spotless brought these actions against Carlisle Plastics, Inc. (“Carlisle”), now known as A & E Products Group, L.P., 2 alleging infringement of various patents and trademarks. A & E counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of non-infringement or invalidity of the asserted patents and trademarks. The surviving claims of the two above-captioned actions were consolidated…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arminak & Associates, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. Kwik Lok Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative AccessoriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Arminak & Associates, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Lifted Limited, LLC v. Novelty Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020