Legal Opinion

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Gold Key Storage

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 14, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00835Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:24-cv-00835-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GOLD KEY STORAGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned by Local 19 Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff’s complaint is before the court for screening. Plaintiff seeks leave to 20 proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915. The request is granted. 22 I.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API