Legal Opinion · Dissent

Provident Bank v. Tri-County Southside Asphalt, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2004No. 49A02-0304-CV-341Published

1DissentSharpnack, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Tri-County me-chaniec's lien has priority over Provident's previously executed and recorded mortgage to the extent of Tri-County's improvement and to hold otherwise is to not give effect to the legislature's intent.

The parties agree that December 8, 1999, is Provident's priority date, and June 13, 2000, is Tri-County's priority date; however, they disagree with respect to how the dates establish priority in accordance with Ind.Code § 32-28-3-2 (2002). The issue here is less about priority in time than about priority as to the improvement which is the subject of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Brenneman Mechanical & Electrical, Inc. v. First National Bank of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Zehner v. JohnstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Carriger v. MackeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API