Legal Opinion

Touhey Co. v. Shongo Construction Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1917Published

Motion to allow the city of Rochester to intervene as a party defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

1. This action is brought to restrain the defendant from negligently operating under a contract for the deepening of the Genesee river and to recover the damages occasioned thereby. The city asks to intervene on the ground that it has such an interest in the public improvement that it should be brought in as a party and should be allowed to defend. The question involves the construction of section 452 of the Code of Civil Procedure which is the only provision applicable to a situation such as exists here where a third party seeks to intervene. Intervention under section 820 only relates to an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Rosenberg v. . SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Bauer v. . DeweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Merchants' National Bank v. HagemeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. H.B.C. Co. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API