Legal Opinion

Matosantos Int’l Corp. v. P Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. & Twin City Fire Insurance Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 2023No. 21-cv-317-LMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Matosantos Int’l Corp. v. Civil No. 21-cv-317-LM Opinion No.

2023 DNH 080

P Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. & Twin City Fire Insurance Co. ORDER Plaintiff Matosantos International Corporation (“Matosantos”) brought this insurance coverage suit against defendants Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Twin City Fire Insurance Company (together, “Hartford”). The suit relates to workers’ compensation insurance coverage under a Hartford-issued policy (the “Policy”) for a May 2018 motor vehicle accident involving one of Matosantos’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Borges Ex Rel. SMBW v. Serrano-IsernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Irobe v. US Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matosantos International Corporation v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API