Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Human Rights Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1988No. 87-2722PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

Pursuant to section 8 — 111 of the Illinois Human Rights Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 68, par. 8 — 111), and article III of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 3 — 101 et seq.), petitioner, Raul Castaneda, appeals from an order and decision of a panel of the Illinois Human Rights Commission dismissing with prejudice his complaint of discrimination against respondent, Corroon & Black of Illinois. Petitioner contends that a default judgment should have been entered against respondent for violating various discovery orders and that the decision was against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Northwestern University v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jackson Park Yacht Club v. Department of Local Government AffairsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Danison v. PaleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Trittipo v. O'BRIENAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass'n v. ShapoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Davis v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Grigoleit Co. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API