Legal Opinion
Wold v. Fellows Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 11, 1997No. 96 C 1581PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Robert Wold (“Wold”) charges his former employer Fellows Corporation (“Fellows”) with age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA,” 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)). Fellows has moved for summary judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56, both sides have complied with this District Court’s General Rule (“GR”) 12(M) and 12(N) 1 and the motion is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Fellows’ motion is denied and this action will proceed to trial.
Summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rivera v. Baccarat, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Rayl v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Myers v. IHC Construction Companies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021