Legal Opinion
Brand v. Brand
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided November 18, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Case 85 — Action by Y. H. BRAND against G. C. BRAND, and OTHERS ON A PROMISSORY NOTE. APPEAL PROM PAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT. OIROM AN ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION, HE APPEALS AND FROM AN ORDER OVERRULING A DEMURRER TO THE PETITION DEFENDANTS appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
CHIEE JUSTICE BURNAM.
The appellant, Virginia Brand, brought this suit against the appellees in the Fayette circuit court to collect the following promissory note:
“$4,999.91.
“Kirkwood, Mo., March 1, 18S6.
“Twelve months after date we promise to pay to the order of Virginia H. Brand, fort3r-nine hundred and ninety-nine dollars and ninety-one' cents for value received. Negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount, and with interest from date at the rate of eight per cent, per annum. Payable at the St. Louis National Bank, St. Louis, Mo. BRAND & HOLTZMAN.”
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Boswell's Lessee v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Robert Y. Brent, Surviving of Robert Brent, Use of the United States v. The President and Directors of the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Bank of the United States v. DonnallySupreme Court of the United States · 1834
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Warner v. Buffalo Drydock Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Stokke v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. Beeler's Admx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.