Legal Opinion

Preston v. McClelland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, C. J.

1. The defendant listed his property with different agents, and claimed that the listing with plaintiff was not exclusive, and that he had a right to sell the property which he did to or through other realtors. The deed was made directly to E. R. Moore, who is the party whom plaintiff claims to have produced as a purchaser of the property. This fact, however, was not known or communicated to the defendant by plaintiff or anyone else until after the conveyance to Moore. The terms of the sale by defendant to Moore were not the same as the terms which plaintiff claims to have given Moore. Thus…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haswell v. StandringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Johnson Bros. v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Morey v. LairdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Beamer v. StuberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Vennum v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Popejoy v. EastburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Foley v. MathiasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API