Legal Opinion
In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Kinney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrapser, J.
This appeal is taken by the Industrial Commissioner from the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, dated January 6,1939, which ruled, as a matter of law, in a divided opinion, that the claimant, Michael E: Kinney, did not work in covered employment during his base year 1937 and, therefore, was not entitled to benefits on the ground that the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as liquidator of the New York Title and Mortgage Company, is an exempt employer within the meaning of paragraph (d) of subdivision 3 of section 502 of the Unemployment Insurance Law.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of People (Tit. Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People Ex Rel. Westchester Fire Insurance v. DavenportNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Helvering v. TherrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- White v. BolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by15 opinions
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Young v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Corcoran v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Corcoran v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Dinallo v. DiNapoliNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.