Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Burke

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1990No. 9015SC226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for directed verdict on the grounds that 1) *185there was insufficient evidence regarding the issue of defendant’s negligence which was a proximate cause of plaintiffs injury to go to the jury, and 2) the evidence disclosed that the plaintiff was contributorially negligent as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

In determining a motion for a directed verdict pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dendy v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Ragland v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Culler v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Womack v. StephensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API