Legal Opinion

(PS) Bryant v. Steinburg

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 4, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01308Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMIA L. BRYANT, et al., No. 2:22–cv–1308–TLN–KJN PS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AND FINDINGS AND 13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 14 DARRELL STEINBURG, et al., (ECF No. 1, 4, 5.) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff’s initial complaint filed on July 25, 2022, alleged a Fourteenth Amendment due 18 process claim under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

as well as a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 241. (ECF No. 1.) 19 The court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), screened this 20…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API