Spaulding v. . Strang

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of the former firm of Bradner & Fur-man, against Gabriel Furman, surviving partner of said firm, and Peter O. Strang, assignee, to set aside, for the plaintiff’s benefit, a general assignment, made by said firm, to the defendant Strang, for the benefit of their creditors.

Upon the trial at Special Term, the assignment was held fraudulent and.void, as against the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered accordingly. The General Term affirmed the judgment, and the defendants have appealed to this court.

It does not appear, from the…