Rapalee v. . Stewart
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Supreme Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the following opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtMarvin, J.
Action by plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendants, Stewart & Tunnicliff, to set aside an assignment made by the debtors to the other defendants, Morgan & Smith. The assignment is attacked for fraud appearing in it, and for frauds not so appearing. The assignment bears date October 21, 1850. This action was commenced in January, 1853, upon a judgment recovered October 1, 1852. The defendants, among other things, denied that there is any sum justly, equitably and actually due to the plaintiff upon the judgment, because they say that Steeart & Tunnicliff, October 21, 1850, made a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hone v. HenriquezCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1834
- Jessup v. . HulseNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Woodburist v. MosherNew York Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by24 opinions
- Chafee v. Fourth National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
- Crook v. . RindskopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Robenson v. TonnTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Kyle v. HarveysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Davis v. ShaferU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1892
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.