Beamel Amusement Corp. v. Police Department
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
Gambling has been called a disease of barbarians, superficially civilized. In a legal frame of reference it is characterized in somewhat the same way, a play for value against an uncertain event in the hope of gaining something of value. Thus a gambling device is that which is utilized to facilitate the play for excess value.
*947Here we are concerned with 10 pinball machines seized by the Suffolk County Police Department from petitioner’s premises. Petitioner charges that the seizure was procedurally unlawful, and unwarranted as to these machines in any event since they were not and are not ‘ ‘…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RazianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- People v. HortonNew York Justice Court · 1961
- People v. AntonelliNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- People v. KimCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Holley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989