Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTEMURO, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court, 422 Pa.Super. 48, 618 A.2d 1009, affirming the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County denying appellants’ petition for return of prop*1107erty. Appellants, Wylie E. Irwin and Diana W. Irwin, are owners of a business known as Side Show Pizza. The Commonwealth seized certain amusement games from the appellants’ establishment as gambling devices, and appellants commenced this action to compel the return of the games pursuant to Pa. R.Crim.P. 324.1 The sole question presented for our review is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Nu-Ken Novelty, Inc. v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. 9 Mills Mechanical Slot MachinesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. Twelve Dodge City Video Poker MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KratsasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. Wintel, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. In re: Three PA Skill Amusement Devices ~ Appeal of: Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. In re: Three PA Skill Amusement; Apl. of: CommSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. In re: Three PA Skill Amusement; Apl. of: CommSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API