Legal Opinion
Wilkins v. Kirkbride
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 15, 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Bill to foreclose. On petition of Ella C. Stoy and others, •to be admitted as parties defendant to the suit.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The bill in this cause was filed for foreclosure and sale of premises in Burlington county,, mortgaged to the complainant’s assignor by Phjneas Kirkbride. The mortgage is, by its terms, in fee. The premises are said in the bill to be the same which were conveyed to the mortgagor by Robert "W. Kirkbride and his wife. Besides the complainant’s mortgage there are other subsequent encumbrances (mortgages and judgments) on the property. The prayer for relief is in the usual form. The parties defendant to the bill are the mortgagor and the holders of encumbrances subsequent to that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Eagle Fire Co. v. LentNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Corning v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Administrators of Lyman v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
- Lee v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sorg v. TowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935