Legal Opinion

Pennbarr Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 25, 1992No. Nos. 91-5607, 91-5608 and 91-5642PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to interpret the indemnity period of a business interruption insurance policy. Appellees, Remington Rand Corporation, Delaware, and its wholly owned subsidiary Remington Rand Corporation, New' Jersey, (collectively “Remington”) 1 brought suit against appellant, the Insurance Company of North America (“INA”), for recovery of lost profits and royalties allegedly due and owing under a business interruption insurance policy procured from INA in December of 1979. The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict was rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Tigg Corporation v. Dow Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc. v. PitterichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chesapeake Paper Products Co. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Milton Donald v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  4. B a Properties, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
  5. Seidenberg v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API