Legal Opinion

United States v. Harvey

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 7, 1997No. IP 96-0554-C-T/GPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1003Entry Addressing Summary Judgment Matters

TINDER, District Judge.

The court, having considered the numerous documents filed in conjunction with the parties’ summary judgment motions in this matter, finds that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment will be DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART, and that Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment will be DENIED.

I. Introduction

The government brought this action on behalf of the Secretary .of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The HUD Secretary (“Secretary”) seeks civil damages allegedly arising from the “unauthorized use,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Retirement Services GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Retmnt Svcs GrpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API