Legal Opinion · Dissent

Highlands Development Corp. v. City of Boise

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2008No. 33174Published

1DissentJ. Jones, J.

Although I would deny relief to Highlands on the merits, I dissent from the Court’s opinion because it will effectively foreclose review of quasi-judicial zoning decisions under the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act, I.C. §§ 67-5201-5292 (IDAPA). The opinion will prevent property owners from obtaining judicial review of decisions downzoning their property and preclude unhappy neighbors from challenging decisions to upzone adjacent property. Historically, this Court has extended review to quasi-judicial zoning decisions. See, e.g., In Re Application for Zoning Change, 140 Idaho 512, 96 P.3d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cooper v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Nation v. State, Dept. of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Evans v. Teton CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API