Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Van Harris Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1985No. 8411DC446PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiffs prayed for a declaratory judgment establishing that they have an easement over a roadway across land owned by defendant. They claim the easement through prescriptive use by themselves and their predecessors in title. Defendant contends the court erred in failing to grant its motion for a directed verdict. We agree and accordingly reverse.

Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50 defendant is entitled to a directed verdict only if the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, fails to show each and every element required to establish an easement by prescription.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Henry v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of Brunswick County Taxpayers Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Johnson v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Yadkin Valley Land Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Pitcock v. FoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. BaitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API