Legal Opinion

Pacific Insurance Company of New York v. Frank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1969No. 41520PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Vice Chief Justice.

Defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought an action to recover for loss under a fire insurance policy issued by plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, or the insurer. Judgment was entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and defendant appealed.

Plaintiff owned and operated a retail department store, located in a leased building in Sapulpa, Oklahoma. The furniture and store fixtures were insured for $15,000.00, under the policy involved. Early in the morning of April 14, 1963, (Easter Sunday) the property was destroyed by fire. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kinyon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Cities Service Gas Co. v. EggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Standard Marine Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Traders CompressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Chase v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Manis v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Hoosier Ins. Co., Inc. v. ManginoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. American Fertilizer Specialists, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Don Burton, Inc. And Don Burton, Individually v. Aetna Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API