Legal Opinion

Dalbey's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1937No. Appeal, 73PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Kephart,

The facts show that in 1926 decedent, John W. Dalbey, executed a will which he kept along with other papers in a small wooden box in his house. He always had free access to the box up to his death. When he died neither this will nor any other could be found, and an administration was raised on his estate. His widow endeavors to have a copy of the 1926 will probated.

The court below properly held that the execution and contents' of the lost will had each been satisfactorily proved by two competent witnesses as required by law: see Harrison’s Estate, 316 Pa.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harrison's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Frew v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  3. People Ex Rel. Bradford v. ArcegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Leighton v. LeightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Foster's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hendrickson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Gerlach EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. In Re Estate of StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. In Re Killgore's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Murray WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API