Legal Opinion
Hack v. President & Fellows of Yale College
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 28, 2000No. 98-9136PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoran, Senior District Judge
Yale College (Yale) requires all unmarried freshmen and sophomores under the age of 21 to reside in college dormitories, all of which are co-educational. The plaintiffs were Yale freshmen and sophomores when they brought this suit. They represent that as devout Orthodox Jews they cannot reside in those dormitories because to do so would conflict with their religious convictions and duties. Plaintiffs contend that Yale is a state actor or instrumentality and, therefore, the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments invalidate the parietal rule pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *84dard: only if (1) the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Christy Sports, LLC v. Deer Valley Resort Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Elisha D. Hack v. The President And Fellows Of Yale CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Strougo v. BassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Mitchell v. Century 21 Rustic RealtyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Lynn v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.