United States v. Nelson
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
THE CASE
HILLMAN, District Judge.
The defendant, Earl Nelson, was indicted by a federal grand jury for making materially false statements on a loan application to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. Acting upon motion of the defendant, Chief Judge Noel P. Fox dismissed the indictment due to insufficiency of the evidence and because enforcement of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 was held to violate the defendant’s privacy rights. The United States Attorney moved to have the indictment reinstated. The case was subsequently reassigned by Judge Fox, and the matter is currently before me. I…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. DutelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- United States v. HadimaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005