Roma W. Co. v. Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action on two fire insurance policies issued by the defendants, one covering a building used by the plaintiff as a winery and the other covering certain wines stored therein. After a verdict in favor of the defendants the court entered an order granting the plaintiff a new trial, the order reciting that the new trial was granted on the insufficiency of the evidence. From this order the defendants have appealed.
The rules of law applicable upon such an appeal are well settled. The question presented is whether or not the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Peri v. CulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Roberts v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. RupardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hames v. RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
- Helle v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. LanasaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Union Oil Co. v. HaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.