New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. Rupard
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Hurt
Affirming.
In the circuit court, the appellant, The New Hampshire Fire Insurance Company, and each of the following named insurance companies, Phoenix Assurance Company, Ltd., of London, Boston Insurance Company, Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Michigan Commercial Insurance Company, Germania Fire Inrsurance Company, of New York, Caledonian Insurance Company, The Connecticut Fire Insurance Company, Northern Fire Insurance Company, Henry Clay Fire Insurance Company, and The North American Assurance Company, were defendants in separate actions, which…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Peters v. Warren InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- LaForce v. Williams City Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Transatlantic Fire Insurance v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scott v. E. L. Yeager Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. F. L. Feaster, Doing Business as Feaster Trucking ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Tannenbaum v. Connecticut Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Githens v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Goldfarb v. Maryland Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.