Legal Opinion

North v. North

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1905PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action by wife against husband for support.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff and the defendant being domiciled as husband and wife in the state of New York, the plaintiff voluntarily and without cause separated from the defendant and refused to live with him. Thereafter, viz., in 1898, the defendant gave up his domicile in the state of New York, and went to the state of California for the purpose of actually and in good faith acquiring a permanent domicile there, and he did take np his permanent domicile there actually and in good faith. The plaintiff remained in the state of New York. After being so' domiciled in California for three years,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. O'Dea v. . O'DeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Standish v. StandishNew York Family Court · 1943
  3. In re the Estate of SmidtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. Post v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Loomis v. LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API