Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Alexis O.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 29, 2008No. 2008-133Published

1ConcurrenceDuggan, J.

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC) procedures are not required in this case. I write separately, however, because I would reach the same result by applying the ICPC regulations. See Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, ICPC Regulations, available at http://icpc.aphsa.org/home/regulations.asp (ICPC Regulations). I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the ICPC Regulations conflict with the plain language of the statute; I would therefore apply them to this case.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Adoption of WarrenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Green v. Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  5. In re Bill F.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API