Kreider v. Wellenbach
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Honorable Lawrence Prattis’ order denying defendants’ motion for post-trial relief. After a lengthy medical malpractice trial, the judge ordered a new trial on the ground that the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict concerning defendants’ negligence. The defendants argue on appeal that the judge should have molded the jury verdict to conform to the jurors’ expressed intentions.1 We *209find that the jury never rendered a verdict. There being no verdict, there was no verdict to mold. We therefore affirm.
Mrs. Kreider, a named plaintiff, suffers from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Havranek v. PitssburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hickman v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Oblon v. Ludlow-Fourth Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- BOWIE v. SHELTONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alkozbari, A. v. Wanaselja, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024