Legal Opinion

Kreider v. Wellenbach

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1993No. 1331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Honorable Lawrence Prattis’ order denying defendants’ motion for post-trial relief. After a lengthy medical malpractice trial, the judge ordered a new trial on the ground that the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict concerning defendants’ negligence. The defendants argue on appeal that the judge should have molded the jury verdict to conform to the jurors’ expressed intentions.1 We *209find that the jury never rendered a verdict. There being no verdict, there was no verdict to mold. We therefore affirm.

Mrs. Kreider, a named plaintiff, suffers from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Havranek v. PitssburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Hickman v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Oblon v. Ludlow-Fourth Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. BOWIE v. SHELTONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alkozbari, A. v. Wanaselja, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API