Legal Opinion

State v. Hawkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM CANNON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Cannon County. B. M. Webb, Oh.

1Opinion of the Court

LüRTON, J.

Tlie cases of the State v. J. B. Hawkins and Wm. McMahon and State v. J. B. Hawkins and J. B. Smith were consolidated and ordered to be heard together.

A decree of the September Term, 1890, recites that the attorneys for the State demanded a jury to try the issues of fact to be submitted, and that a jury was duly impaneled and sworn to try the issues tendered and a true verdict render.

The bills of the State alleged, in substance:

First. — That an application was made to the Comptroller for pensions, under the Act of 1887, by the defendants J. B. Smith and Wm. McMahon; that J. B. Smith…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Railway Companies v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Life Insurance v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  2. McAmis v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  3. Heald v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Pratt v. GillespieTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Green v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API