Legal Opinion

Rodman v. Manning

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1908PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. Plaintiff obtained a decree in the circuit court of Lane County; from which the defendant attempts to appeal. Respondent now moves to dismiss the appeal.

1Per curiam

On August 1, 1907, plaintiff recovered a decree in the circuit court for Lane County against defendants, and from this decree defendants attempt to appeal. The notice of appeal, as it appears in the transcript, shows that it was filed on August 26th, and the indorsement of proof of service is dated the 26th of the following month. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, because the proof of service of the notice was not indorsed thereon at the time it was filed.

1. The statute provides that, when an appeal is not taken at the time the decision is rendered, it may be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Briney v. StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wolf v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Henness v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Oliver v. HarveyOregon Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CoachOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Muckle v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In Re Wagner's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Templeton v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. In Re Mannix EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API