Legal Opinion

People v. Sharff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTilzer, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a trial by jury of rape in the first degree and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years.

The jury went into deliberations at about 12:30 p.m. It appears that about five hours later the jury reported that it was “ still having additional arguments ”, Thereupon, the court gave the following supplemental instructions:

As you all know, the purpose of a trial is a search for the truth.

Therefore, if it is at all possible, it is desirable that a jury should reach a verdict, one way or the other.

I am not suggesting that you…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Carlo P. Minieri and Salvatore SaponaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. CommerfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. EnglishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. People v. TownesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. NievesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API