Legal Opinion
Carolina Power & Light Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 14, 2011No. 04-037CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
This case is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See Carolina Power & Light Co. v. United States, 573 F.3d 1271 (Fed.Cir.2009). Plaintiffs Carolina Power & Light Company and Florida Power Corporation (collectively “Progress Energy”) own five nuclear reactors at four power plants in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Florida. The power plants are known as Harris, Brunswick, Robinson, and Crystal River. Progress Energy incurred substantial costs at these plants because the Department of Energy (DOE) failed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Frank Gaylord v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.