Legal Opinion

Pascal v. Hynes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon. A. P. Barker, Judge. The facts appear in the opinion. Both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Plaintiffs own the Wy2 NW% of Section 9 and the defendant, the W/2 of said quarter and the' Ey2 SW^ of Section 4, immediately above it. Between the sections is a highway which has been graded so as to be about 3y2 feet above the natural surface. Near the southwest corner of the 80 in Section 4 was a pond of about two acres. Across the road to the southeast was a smaller pond. A swale extended from near these ponds in a southwesterly direction into the land of plaintiffs and then southerly for a distance of about 80 rods, emptying into a larger pond of about 3 acres, mostly in the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vannest v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Dorr v. SimmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Hatton v. CaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Ruthven v. Farmers Co-operative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Robinson v. LutherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McKeon v. BrammerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Loughman v. CouchmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Beasley v. EngstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Conklin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Maisel v. GelhausCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API