Pascal v. Hynes
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon. A. P. Barker, Judge. The facts appear in the opinion. Both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
Plaintiffs own the Wy2 NW% of Section 9 and the defendant, the W/2 of said quarter and the' Ey2 SW^ of Section 4, immediately above it. Between the sections is a highway which has been graded so as to be about 3y2 feet above the natural surface. Near the southwest corner of the 80 in Section 4 was a pond of about two acres. Across the road to the southeast was a smaller pond. A swale extended from near these ponds in a southwesterly direction into the land of plaintiffs and then southerly for a distance of about 80 rods, emptying into a larger pond of about 3 acres, mostly in the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vannest v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Dorr v. SimmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Hatton v. CaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Ruthven v. Farmers Co-operative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Robinson v. LutherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McKeon v. BrammerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Loughman v. CouchmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Beasley v. EngstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Conklin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Maisel v. GelhausCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.