Stoken v. JET Electronics and Technology, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from two orders entered by the trial court. First the trial court denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of all proofs. Then a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, awarding plaintiff damages of $14,152.18, was returned on May 1, 1987, following which defendant made a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial, or remittitur, which also was denied. We hold that defendant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been granted. Therefore, we vacate the jury’s verdict, the judgment after verdict, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Longley v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Struble v. Lacks Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Damrow v. Thumb Cooperative Terminal, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Goldman v. Phantom Freight, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by23 opinions
- Prysak v. R L Polk Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gonyea v. Motor Parts Federal Credit UnionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Haberkorn v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mourad v. Automobile Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Schutte v. Celotex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.