Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Langham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1994No. CR-92-1302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

The appellants, Carvine Langham, John Forister, and John Chapman, were convicted of violating the state ethics law, specifically of using their official positions to obtain direct personal financial gain, in violation of § 36-25-5(a), Code ofAlabama 1975. Langham was convicted of 11 counts of ethics violations, and she was sentenced to two years' imprisonment on each conviction, with the sentence suspended, and she was ordered to pay $11,108 restitution. Forister…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Faircloth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Water Works v. Consolidated Pub., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ex Parte KragesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Dill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API