Electric Reduction Co. v. Colonial Steel Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This action is assumpsit to recover the purchase price of ferro-tungsten powder sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The verdict was for plaintiff for the full amount of its claim; following the entry of judgment thereon, defendant appealed. " '.
Plaintiff is a manufacturer of ferro-tungsten powder, defendant of high-speed steel used in the making of tools and cutlery. The commodity, the subject of the suit, is a *184very important component of the kind of steel produced by appellant.
The parties entered into a written contract evidenced by two letters, by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Branch, Sons & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Guillon v. EarnshawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Albus v. ToomeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Evans v. Western Brass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. Penbridge Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.