Legal Opinion

Boehme v. Town of Secaucus

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided May 11, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a proceeding brought on a formal petition by Rudolph Boehme, Jr., during his lifetime, as petitioner, and against the town of Secaucus, a municipal corporation in the county of Hudson and State of New Jersey, as respondent, and on a supplemental petition by Hattie Boehme, executrix of the estate of Rudolph Boehme, Jr., deceased, as petitioner, and against the town of Secaucus, a municipal corporation in the county of Hudson and State of New Jersey, as respondent, under and by virtue of the provisions of an act entitled “An act authorizing and requiring municipalities and fire…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beerman v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Celeste v. Progressive Silk Finishing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API