Legal Opinion
Celeste v. Progressive Silk Finishing Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 1, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
72 N.J. Super. 125 (1962)
178 A.2d 74
NICOLA CELESTE, BY CATHERINE CELESTE, HIS WIDOW, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
PROGRESSIVE SILK FINISHING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
CATHERINE CELESTE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
PROGRESSIVE SILK FINISHING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 13, 1961.
Decided February 1, 1962.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Schwartz & Horowitz, attorneys; Mr. Gordon, of counsel).
The opinion of the court…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Stanley Co. of America v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Ricciardi v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Russo v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harbatuk v. S & S Furniture Systems InsulationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- O'REGAN v. New Jersey Hardware Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- In Re SafersteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978