Legal Opinion

In re Dow

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided April 15, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

At the instance of the applicant and other Syrians interested, a rehearing was granted in this case, which has been had, and argument has been heard -on behalf of the applicant himself as well .as from counsel appearing on behalf of the Syrian American Associations of the country.

'Deep feeling has been manifested on the part of the Syrian immigrants because of what has been termed by them the humiliation inflicted upon, and mortification suffered by, Syrians in America by the previous decree in this matter which they construe as deciding that they do not (as they term…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte ShahidDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1913
  2. Ex parte DowDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re VasicekDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1921
  2. Petition of Easurk Emsen CharrDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1921
  3. In re Sadar Bhagwab SinghDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. In re Takao OzawaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API