Legal Opinion
Wanda Sell v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2012No. 11-15492UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiff Wanda Sell is a trustee and senior beneficiary of a trust that includes a ranch. Rigoberto Ocegueda is a residual beneficiary of the trust. Ocegueda filed a petition in state court seeking an order removing Sell as trustee and directing the trustee to provide him with possession and control of the ranch. In the petition, Oce-gueda alleged that Sell failed to meet the trust’s conditions to receive the ranch. There is no evidence that Ocegueda had been physically present on or physically possessed the ranch since the trust was established. The trust held liability coverage…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Tomaselli v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albert v. Truck Ins. Exch., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Gandy Dancer, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Dorroh v. Deerbrook Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Albert v. Truck Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018