Legal Opinion
Marvin A. Allen v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1982No. 81-5222PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORRICK, District Judge:
Appellant, Marvin A. Allen, pled guilty to two charges of unarmed bank robbery and was sentenced to an indeterminate ten-year sentence under the Narcotics Addict Rehabilitation Act (“NARA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 4251-4255. He now appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the United States Parole Commission (the “Commission”) acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it did not consider in the petitioner’s parole hearing the fact that he had received a certification of program completion of the NARA program. We affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Payton v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Persico v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1977
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- William J. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Timothy J. Adams v. O.J. Keller, Commissioner and the U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Hyman A. Lieberman v. Robert A. Gunnell, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, Connecticut and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Timothy J. Adams v. O.J. Keller, Commissioner and the U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Cagnina v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.