Legal Opinion

Cromer v. Boinest

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 29, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Fraser, J., Newberry, November, 1886. The opinion fully states the ease,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McIver.

The question of jurisdiction raised by this appeal is one of the gravest importance, and must necessarily be first determined before any of the other questions presented can be properly considered. For if Judge Fraser, when he rendered the decree appealed from, was neither a judge de jure nor defacto, then it is quite clear that the paper styled a decree is an absolute nullity, and cannot present any question proper to be considered by this tribunal; and if it is an absolute nullity, then all the so-called decrees and judgments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Wilcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Sheehan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Petersilea v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Cocke Ex Rel. Commercial Bank of Columbus v. HalseySupreme Court of the United States · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WinglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Welch v. GetzenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. Court of Probate of Colleton CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Gibbes v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API