Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Van Orden v. Sauvinet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1872No. 3869PublishedCited by 14 opinions

A IMPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Cooley, J.

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, Justice

Taliaferro, J.

The relator complains that he is under illegal .surest and hold in custody by the civil sheriff of the parish of Orleans in obedience to an order rendered by the judge of the Sixth District Court-of the parish of Orleans, on the sixth of March, 1872, sentencing him to arrest and to be held in custody by the sheriff for the term of ten days for an alleged contempt of the orders of the said court. He alleges that for the offense charged against him, and for which he was sentenced as aforesaid, and tinder pretense of which he is now under arrest and deprived of his liberty, he has…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrossmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. State v. Frew & HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Rodd v. VerageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. Magee Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People ex rel. Brundage v. PetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API