J-IV Investments v. David Lynn MacHine, Inc.

OPINION

McCLUNG, Justice.

A judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted to David Lynn Machine, Inc. J-IV Investments appeals therefrom complaining the trial court erred, in: holding there was no evidence to support the jury’s finding of fraud; failing to disregard the jury’s answer to question number two; failing to grant a declaratory judgment; striking or disallowing certain pleadings; not disclosing information that would be a basis for recusal; and, denying its motion for retroactive recusal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

There is no statement of facts in this case, so we derive…